QUICK VERDICT
The Short Answer
Microsoft Foundry is the better fit when your applications, data and identity already live in Azure and Microsoft 365, your developers want Microsoft to host prompt agents or containerised agent code, and your regulators accept agents executing in an Azure region under Entra identities and Azure Policy.
VDF AI is the better fit when some agents must run on infrastructure you operate, sometimes with no connection at all, when models come from several providers or from your own GPUs, and when governance and cost ceilings have to survive a future move away from any one cloud.
PRICING & DEPLOYMENT
Foundry Metering and Deployment Scope
Microsoft bills each Foundry component on its own meter; VDF AI sells access by user or by an agreed capacity.
Microsoft Foundry Pricing
Checked 27 Sep 2026 on the Foundry pricing page and the Agent Service pricing page
Hosted-agent compute follows sessions, and Microsoft’s own sizing notes warn that an oversized sandbox multiplies cost by concurrency. Plan tokens, tools, tracing ingestion and storage as separate budget lines. Microsoft also lists a one-year Agent pre-purchase plan on the Foundry pricing page.
VDF AI Pricing
Mechanics are published on the VDF AI pricing page
The on-premises figure is fixed before the term starts. A longer agent run draws more tokens from the pool, yet the governance work wrapped around it never adds to the count.
What runs where, stated precisely
Foundry Agent Service is an Azure platform service: prompt agents and hosted agents execute on Microsoft-managed compute in Azure regions, and virtual-network isolation plus bring-your-own storage, Azure AI Search and Cosmos DB are the controls for keeping data close. Microsoft’s on-premises story is a different product line. Foundry Local on Azure Local serves models on Arc-enabled Kubernetes, and Agentic Retrieval in Foundry Local adds local RAG agents with an MCP server; both were in preview when we checked. VDF AI ships the same product surface to its cloud and to self-hosted clusters, which is why the on-premises deployment is not a reduced edition.
GOVERNANCE
Identity, Policy & Evidence
Both platforms take governance seriously; they anchor it to different things.
Identity
Tool access
Runtime guardrails
Data location
Audit evidence
Spend control
The wider control model is described on the AI governance platform page.
BUILDING AGENTS
Foundry Agent Service vs VDF AI Agents
Foundry is built for developers who want Azure to host their agent code; VDF AI is built for teams that want a governed product around the agent.
How Foundry approaches it
- Three agent types — prompt agents defined by configuration, voice-based prompt agents (preview), and hosted agents that run your own container
- Framework choice — hosted agents accept Microsoft Agent Framework, LangGraph, the OpenAI Agents SDK, the Anthropic Agent SDK or custom code
- Toolboxes — web search, file search, code interpreter, MCP servers and OpenAPI tools curated once and shared
- Distribution — publish to Teams, Microsoft 365 Copilot and the Entra Agent Registry; A2A v1.0 is generally available
- Hosted in Azure — hosted-agent sandboxes run only in the Azure regions Microsoft lists for them
- Government cloud gap — Microsoft’s region guide lists Azure AI Agents as unsupported in US Gov regions (page dated August 2026)
How VDF AI approaches it
- VDF AI Agents — agents assembled from reusable Agent Skills, governed tools and connected knowledge
- VDF AI Networks — staged multi-agent work with visible intermediate outputs, schedules, webhooks and Human Approval nodes
- Smart routing — Auto, Sustainable and Regulated modes choose a model per step from the list an admin permits
- Microsoft reach — one Microsoft sign-in covers OneDrive, Outlook, SharePoint, Planner, Azure DevOps and Dynamics 365
- Beyond Microsoft — Jira, Confluence, GitHub, Slack, Notion and Google connectors under the same audit trail
- Smaller catalogue — VDF AI routes between the providers and local models you approve rather than fronting a 10,000-model marketplace
Weighing Microsoft’s low-code builder rather than Foundry? Read the Copilot Studio comparison, or the broader guide to Copilot alternatives.
ARCHITECTURE
Where Each Platform Can Run
The deciding question for regulated buyers is rarely features. It is location.
Microsoft Foundry
Azure PaaS with preview edge options
- Foundry projects — created in listed Azure regions, plus US Gov Arizona and Virginia
- Agent Service — prompt and hosted agents on Microsoft-managed compute
- Private networking — VNet isolation, a BYO VNet for hosted agents, BYO storage and Cosmos DB
- Foundry Local on Azure Local — model serving on Arc-enabled Kubernetes (preview, by request)
- Agentic Retrieval in Foundry Local — local RAG agents, knowledge bases and an MCP server (preview)
Azure Local disconnected operations were announced as available worldwide in February 2026. Microsoft documents the local agent layer as its own Arc extension with a narrower feature set, not as Agent Service running on your hardware.
VDF AI
One product, four landing zones
- VDF Cloud — the managed service, operated by VDF AI
- Self-hosted — signed container packages from portal.vdf.ai on Docker Compose or any conformant Kubernetes, AKS included
- Private or sovereign cloud — the same packages inside a tenancy you control
- Air-gapped — images mirrored into your internal registry, with the router’s air-gap mode keeping calls local
- State — PostgreSQL 16+, self-run or managed, Azure Database for PostgreSQL among the named options
Changing the landing zone changes who runs the servers, not which features the agents get. Sizing guidance lives in the on-prem reference architecture.
DEPLOYMENT
Deployment Scenarios
Seven places an enterprise may need an agent to run, and what each vendor documents for them.
| Scenario | Microsoft Foundry | VDF AI |
|---|---|---|
| Azure commercial region | Foundry Agent Service, prompt and hosted agents | Self-hosted on AKS or VMs in your subscription |
| Azure Government (US) | Foundry projects exist; Azure AI Agents listed as unsupported | Self-hosted on compute you already operate |
| Azure Local, connected | Foundry Local serving and Agentic Retrieval, both preview | Self-hosted on any conformant Kubernetes cluster |
| Fully disconnected site | Agentic Retrieval under the disconnected-operations preview | Air-gapped install from your internal registry |
| Another public cloud | Agents still execute in Azure; callers connect over the network | Same packages; AWS Marketplace listing for the self-hosted edition |
| Data center without Azure Local | No managed runtime; open-source Agent Framework is a do-it-yourself path | Self-hosted platform with vendor support |
| Who runs upgrades | Microsoft, as a managed service | VDF AI on Cloud; your team on its own cadence when self-hosted |
FAIR PLAY
When to Choose Microsoft Foundry
For an Azure-first organisation, Foundry is a strong default and often the right one.
Foundry is the right call when…
- Your data, apps and identity already sit in Azure and Entra, and an Azure region satisfies your regulators.
- You would rather not operate Kubernetes for agents and want scale-to-zero sandboxes managed for you.
- Your developers already write agents with Agent Framework, LangGraph or the OpenAI Agents SDK and want Microsoft to host them.
- You want the widest model catalogue under a single Azure agreement, first-party and partner models side by side.
- Agents must appear in Teams and Microsoft 365 Copilot with the least integration work.
- Voice agents with telephony channels belong in the same platform, and you can live with their preview status.
Where Foundry is genuinely strong
Each hosted agent is issued its own identity at deploy time, so downstream access is scoped and attributable without shared secrets.
More than 10,000 models from Microsoft, OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta and others sit behind one project endpoint.
Per-session VM-isolated sandboxes persist files between turns, scale automatically and emit OpenTelemetry traces.
Published agents reach Teams and Copilot, and Copilot Studio can call a Foundry agent through a preview connection.
DECISION SIGNALS
When VDF AI Fits Better
Signals that a workload needs something other than an Azure-hosted agent runtime.
The site never reaches Azure
A plant floor, a ministry network or a classified enclave may have no path to a cloud region. VDF AI installs from your own registry and keeps working with no outbound connection.
Government cloud is mandatory
If agents must live in US Gov regions, check Microsoft’s feature list first: in August 2026 it marked Azure AI Agents as unsupported there. Self-hosted VDF AI runs on compute you already operate.
Models must run on your GPUs
Open-weight models served by vLLM, Ollama or llama.cpp sit next to Azure OpenAI in one router, with a per-network list of what each workflow may call.
Finance wants one number
Tokens, tool meters and sandbox hours accumulate per session. An annual capacity pool gives finance a figure before the year begins, with routing, policy and audit outside the meter.
Exit risk is on the risk register
Foundry agents lean on Entra agent identities, Toolboxes, Foundry conversation storage and Application Insights. VDF AI behaves the same on AKS, another cloud or bare metal.
Workflows cross ecosystems
One flow that reads Confluence, updates Jira, posts in Slack and files to SharePoint gets a single audit trail when every hop passes through VDF AI connectors and its MCP gateway.
For how Microsoft, Google, AWS and the rest divide the market, see our 2026 vendor landscape; for the product itself, the agent platform overview.
COEXISTENCE
Running Both Side by Side
Most Azure-first enterprises keep Foundry for Azure-native apps and add VDF AI where residency or portability rules apply.
Sort workloads by permitted location
Classify each agent use case by data class and by where it is allowed to execute. Workloads that may run in an Azure region can stay on Foundry; the rest need a landing zone you control.
Stand up VDF AI where Foundry cannot go
Install the self-hosted package in the data center, a sovereign tenancy or a disconnected enclave. Teams that want Azure infrastructure with a portable agent layer can run it on AKS instead.
Reuse what Microsoft already gives you
Connect SharePoint, Outlook and Azure DevOps through the Microsoft connector, which authorises with a work Microsoft account, and register your Azure OpenAI deployments as a model source beside local models.
Compare the evidence, not the demos
Run one regulated workflow on each platform and put both audit records in front of the reviewer who signed off your last compliance cycle. Their verdict is usually quicker than a feature matrix.
FULL COMPARISON
Capability Table
Microsoft details taken from Microsoft Learn and azure.microsoft.com on 27 September 2026.
| Capability | VDF AI | Microsoft Foundry |
|---|---|---|
| Product type | Governed agent platform, cloud or self-hosted | Azure platform service for agents, models and tools |
| Naming | VDF AI Agents, Networks, Router, Chat | Microsoft Foundry, formerly Azure AI Studio and Azure AI Foundry |
| Agent building | Agents with Agent Skills; Networks for staged multi-agent work | Prompt agents, voice agents (preview), hosted agents, workflows |
| Bring your own code | REST APIs across the platform for embedding and automation | Hosted agents run Agent Framework, LangGraph, OpenAI or Anthropic SDKs |
| Model choice | OpenAI, Anthropic, Azure OpenAI, Mistral, Ollama, OpenAI-compatible endpoints | 10,000+ catalog models; agent support varies by region |
| Models on your hardware | vLLM, Ollama and llama.cpp endpoints inside your network | Foundry Local on Azure Local (preview, by request) |
| Identity and access | SSO on Enterprise Cloud; Entra ID SSO on-premise; per-role tool grants in the MCP gateway | Dedicated Entra agent identity, Azure RBAC, OBO |
| Tools and protocols | MCP gateway with per-role grants and per-call audit | Toolboxes via managed MCP endpoint; OpenAPI; A2A v1.0 |
| Guardrails | Allowed models and services, budget caps, Human Approval nodes | Content filters, prompt-injection mitigation, Azure Policy |
| Audit and evidence | Vault record per run; EU AI Act evidence packs | Tracing, evaluations, Application Insights |
| Deployment | VDF Cloud, self-hosted, private cloud, air-gapped | Azure regions; Azure Local options in preview |
| Pricing | Per user (Cloud); annual capacity pool (on-prem) | Tokens, tool meters, hosted-agent vCPU and memory |
| Microsoft 365 reach | Connector for OneDrive, Outlook, SharePoint, Planner, Azure DevOps, Dynamics 365 | Publish into Teams and Microsoft 365 Copilot |
Preview features can change or disappear before general availability. Confirm region and feature status for your own subscription before you design around them.
Microsoft sources checked for this page
- What is Microsoft Foundry (brand history, catalog size)
- Foundry Agent Service overview (agent types, identity, networking, publishing)
- Hosted agents (sandboxes, billing basis, regions)
- Foundry region and sovereign cloud support
- Foundry Local on Azure Local (preview)
- Agentic Retrieval in Foundry Local (preview)
- Microsoft Sovereign Cloud disconnected announcement (Feb 2026)
- Microsoft Agent Framework overview
- Cloud Adoption Framework: Foundry and Copilot Studio
- Connect Copilot Studio to a Foundry agent (preview)
- Foundry pricing and Agent Service pricing
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
Questions Azure architects raise when they look past Foundry.
Related resources
Azure teams usually want to know how the Microsoft 365 estate, regulated workloads and model choice carry over, so these links start with the Microsoft connectors and end with deployment detail.
Need Agents Beyond Azure Regions?
Bring one workflow that cannot run in an Azure region and we will show it running in VDF AI on infrastructure you choose, still reading from Microsoft 365 through the Microsoft connector.