Coverage positions evidenced from the wording
Whether a loss falls within cover is worked through against the operative clause, the exclusions and any endorsement, with each step quoting the language it rests on rather than summarising it.
AI Insurance Agents
AI Agents for Claims & Underwriting
Both halves of an insurer turn on reading a document against a rule: does this policy cover this loss, and does this risk fit this appetite. These agents do that reading at volume and hand the determination to a person who signs it.
2Agents for claims handling and underwriting
WordingCoverage read from the policy, clause by clause
AppetiteRisks graded against your own criteria
HandlerEvery determination signed by a person
Enterprise controls
No coverage or pricing determination by an agentPositions quote the policy wording they rest onOperative version and date of loss recordedAmbiguity escalated rather than resolved
Category overview
Insurance agents for the two decisions the business actually turns on
An insurer makes money on two judgements and loses it on the same two: whether a risk should have been written, and whether a loss is covered. Both are acts of reading — a submission against an appetite, a claim against a wording — performed at volume by people under time pressure with documents that were drafted to be precise rather than quick to read. VDF insurance agents do that reading, evidence the position clause by clause, and hand the determination to the underwriter or handler who signs it.
Submissions graded against your own appetite
Risks are assessed against the criteria your underwriting guide actually states, with the information missing from the submission listed as a specific question back to the broker.
The unusual file separated from the routine one
Straightforward claims and in-appetite risks are identified as such with their checks recorded, so experienced handlers spend their attention on the files that genuinely need judgement.
Insurance Agents
Explore the insurance agents catalog
Open any agent to see how teams use it, what it produces, how it stays compliant, and the questions buyers ask most — plus related tools to go further.
Operating model
Read the document, evidence the position, hand it over
Both agents work the same way because both problems are the same problem: a document that states a rule, a document that states a fact, and a determination that has to be defensible if it is later disputed.
Resolve the operative document
The policy in force at the date of loss, with its schedule, endorsements and any mid-term adjustment, is established first, because coverage questions are routinely answered against the wrong version of the wording.
Read the facts as submitted
Loss notifications, reports, schedules and correspondence are parsed for what they actually assert, with extraction confidence recorded on anything read from a scan or a handwritten form.
Test one against the other
Facts are matched against the operative clauses, exclusions and conditions in sequence, and each step of the resulting position quotes the wording that produced it.
Escalate the judgement
Where cover turns on an interpretation, a valuation or a question of fact the documents do not settle, the file is escalated as an open question rather than resolved on the balance of probability.
Governance & deployment
Determinations that survive a complaint
A declined claim and a declined risk both create a paper trail that a regulator, an ombudsman or a court may later read. What matters is that the position can be traced to the wording and the facts it rested on at the time it was taken, and that a named person took it. These agents produce that trail and never make the determination themselves.
No coverage or pricing determination by an agentPositions quote the policy wording they rest onOperative version and date of loss recordedAmbiguity escalated rather than resolved
FAQ
Questions about insurance agents
What are AI insurance agents on this platform?
Two agents covering the core decisions: claims handling, which reads a loss against the policy wording and evidences the coverage position, and underwriting, which grades a submission against your stated appetite and names the missing information.
Can an agent decline a claim or price a risk?
No. It prepares the coverage position or the risk assessment with the wording and evidence behind it, and an authorised handler or underwriter makes and signs the determination.
How is this different from the banking agents?
Different products and regulators. These work on policies, losses and risk selection. The banking agents work on a bank’s own operations — KYC, credit underwriting, payments and supervisory reporting.
Keep exploring
Related agent categories and resources
Put insurance agents to work on your own infrastructure
See these agents applied to your operations — governed, on-premise, and orchestrated together.