Review incoming paper against your own playbook, research a question with every proposition carrying its source, check internal policies for gaps and contradictions, and turn NDA review into a same-day task.
An in-house team of six cannot read everything a company of six thousand signs, and the gap is closed by triage that nobody writes down. VDF legal agents make that triage explicit: incoming paper compared clause by clause with your own playbook, research returned with every proposition attached to its authority, internal policies checked against each other, and NDAs — the highest-volume, lowest-variance document in the building — handled as the routine work they are. None of them gives legal advice; they prepare the reading so a lawyer spends their time on the judgement.
Incoming drafts are compared with the fallback ladder your team actually approved, and each departure is reported with the playbook position it fails to meet and how far from it the language sits.
Every proposition carries the instrument, case or guidance it rests on with a date and jurisdiction, and anything the sources do not settle is returned as an open question rather than a confident paragraph.
Standard confidentiality paper is triaged against your accepted terms on the day it arrives, leaving only genuinely unusual drafting for a lawyer to look at.
Each agent has its own SEO page with use cases, governance notes, expected outputs, FAQs, and related tools.
Compare incoming paper against your playbook and rank every deviation for a lawyer.
Explore agent Tier 2Research a legal question with the jurisdiction fixed and every proposition cited.
Explore agent Tier 2Find the contradictions, gaps and overdue reviews across your internal policy set.
Explore agent Tier 2Triage NDAs against your accepted terms and surface only the drafting that is unusual.
Explore agentThe boundary is the same for all four agents and it is not a matter of tuning: they produce findings, comparisons and citations. Advice, risk acceptance and signature are legal acts that belong to a qualified person.
Contracts, NDAs and policies are parsed into their clause structure with defined terms resolved, so a confidentiality carve-out is read in the context of the definition it depends on.
Each clause is matched to its playbook entry and graded as compliant, within fallback, or outside the ladder, with the specific wording that creates the gap quoted back.
Where a clause raises a question the playbook is silent on, the research agent scopes it to the governing jurisdiction and date and returns the authorities with their currency stated.
The output is a reviewer packet: ranked deviations, suggested fallback wording marked as proposals, open questions, and the citations behind each point, for a named lawyer to accept, alter or reject.
Legal files are the most confidential documents a company holds and some of them are privileged, which makes sending them to a third-party model a decision with consequences beyond data protection. VDF runs the whole review inside your perimeter, keeps matter-level access restricted to the people already entitled to it, and records that the agent prepared the analysis while a named lawyer reached the conclusion.
They are specialised agents for in-house legal work: contract review against your playbook, jurisdiction-scoped legal research with citations, internal policy review, and NDA triage. They prepare analysis; lawyers make the legal decisions.
No. They produce comparisons, citations and flagged deviations. A legal conclusion, a risk acceptance and a signature are acts reserved to a qualified lawyer, and the output is labelled as preparation throughout.
The legal agent reads any contract against your legal playbook, whichever side it came from. The procurement agent owns the supplier relationship — diligence, obligations and renewals — and calls on legal review as one step within it.
See these agents applied to your operations — governed, on-premise, and orchestrated together.