Misclassification exposes organisations to fines up to €35M or 7% of global revenue. VDF AI Compliance delivers regulation-grounded risk tier decisions with audit-ready rationale.
An appliedAI study of 106 enterprise AI systems found 40% had unclear risk classification. A hiring chatbot could be limited risk or high risk under Annex III — and the wrong pathway means missed deadlines and regulatory exposure.
The Risk Assessment Wizard captures use case, data inputs, affected populations, and decision impact from system owners, then applies the EU AI Act Article 6 two-step test with a written classification decision and rationale. High-risk systems are restricted to approved models.
Structured interview with the AI system owner on use case, data, and impact.
Maps system characteristics against EU AI Act Annex III categories and Article 6 rules.
Produces a formal tier assignment (High / Limited / Minimal / Unacceptable) with rationale.
Deploys risk-tier policy templates and escalation paths for ambiguous cases.
Covers EU AI Act Annex III, Art. 6, Art. 9, and NIST AI RMF MAP 1.1. Every classification is logged with rationale for regulatory inspection.
A practical view of where this workflow breaks, how VDF AI handles it, and what the governed agent stack looks like in production.
Misclassification exposes organisations to fines up to €35M or 7% of global revenue. VDF AI Compliance delivers regulation-grounded risk tier decisions with audit-ready rationale.
An appliedAI study of 106 enterprise AI systems found 40% had unclear risk classification. A hiring chatbot could be limited risk or high risk under Annex III — and the wrong pathway means missed deadlines and regulatory exposure.
The Risk Assessment Wizard captures use case, data inputs, affected populations, and decision impact from system owners, then applies the EU AI Act Article 6 two-step test with a written classification decision and rationale. High-risk systems are restricted to approved models.
Covers EU AI Act Annex III, Art. 6, Art. 9, and NIST AI RMF MAP 1.1. Every classification is logged with rationale for regulatory inspection.
The workflow is designed to produce measurable operational gains without losing enterprise control.
Typical integrations include AI System Register, Policy management tools, Approval workflows, Document repositories. VDF AI can connect this workflow to adjacent use cases across the same business domain while keeping data, decisions, and review steps governed.
You cannot classify risk you do not know exists. VDF AI Compliance discovers AI systems across enterprise silos and produces a live, audit-backed AI System Register with risk pre-classification.
Read Use CaseMost companies run AI in production with zero compliant documentation. VDF AI Compliance generates Annex IV technical docs, transparency notices, and logging specs through a structured owner interview.
Read Use CaseGDPR requires a DPIA; the EU AI Act requires a FRIA — same scope, different frameworks, different teams. VDF AI Compliance runs both in one session with cross-referenced outputs and a deployment gate.
Read Use CasePractical answers for teams evaluating this workflow across security, operations, and deployment.
Talk to an expertA governed workflow that determines whether each AI system is high-risk, limited-risk, minimal-risk, or unacceptable under the EU AI Act — with documented rationale for every decision.
Compliance officers, AI risk managers, and legal teams responsible for EU AI Act readiness — especially ahead of the August 2026 high-risk system deadline.
Ambiguous classifications trigger an escalation workflow for human review while preserving draft rationale and regulatory citations for the compliance team.
Policy templates activate automatically, restricting the system to approved models and surfacing the documentation and monitoring obligations that apply to that tier.
Describe your workflow and we will help map the right governed agent network for your environment.
Talk to Solutions Team