GDPR requires a DPIA; the EU AI Act requires a FRIA — same scope, different frameworks, different teams. VDF AI Compliance runs both in one session with cross-referenced outputs and a deployment gate.
GDPR Article 35 and EU AI Act Article 27 share substantial scope but sit under different legal frameworks and different teams. Running separate processes is duplicative. Only 1 in 19 job postings mentions impact assessments — yet every high-risk AI deployer faces both obligations.
One structured interview captures system description, affected populations, data processed, and decision scope. The platform produces a GDPR Article 35 DPIA and an EU AI Act Article 27 FRIA, cross-references overlaps and inconsistencies, and blocks deployment until FRIA is approved.
Single structured interview covering data protection and fundamental rights scope.
Produces GDPR Article 35 assessment with minimization, proportionality, and safeguards.
Produces EU AI Act Article 27 assessment on fundamental rights impacts.
Identifies overlaps, resolves inconsistencies, and enforces pre-deployment approval.
Addresses EU AI Act Art. 27, GDPR Art. 35, Art. 26 deployer responsibility, and NIST AI RMF MAP 5.1 with versioned, approval-tracked documents.
Misclassification exposes organisations to fines up to €35M or 7% of global revenue. VDF AI Compliance delivers regulation-grounded risk tier decisions with audit-ready rationale.
Read Use CaseOnly 18% of organisations have a governance council with real authority. VDF AI Compliance generates the operating model — charter, RACI, risk appetite, and approval lifecycle — in days.
Read Use CaseAI inherits every data governance failure at scale. VDF AI Compliance links datasets to registered AI systems and surfaces quality, lineage, and erasure risks before models reach production.
Read Use CaseA single workflow that produces both a GDPR Data Protection Impact Assessment and an EU AI Act Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment from one stakeholder interview.
The assessments overlap significantly but are owned by different teams. An integrated process eliminates duplicate interviews and inconsistent conclusions.
No — high-risk systems are gated until the FRIA is approved and stored as pre-deployment evidence.
Yes — assessment templates can be reused across Annex III system categories to accelerate future deployments.
Describe your workflow and we will help map the right governed agent network for your environment.
Talk to Solutions Team